What They Aren't Telling You About The eSlate (Electronic Voting)
As it pertains to the issue of eVoting & eSlate, the voter isn't getting the complete story.
There were numerous statements of safety vulnerabilities, concerns over special use of the methods and various rumors of past exploits of the eSlate system.
I have professionally used near to 20 years vote information technology. I have a total of nearly a decade'experience in security-related techniques from charge card scam control to intrusion prevention.
Is there really such a thing to be concerned about about the Hart InterCivic eSlate system?
According a number of data technology textbooks that specialize in safety, Hart InterCivic is testing its equipment and will not participate in third-party peer-reviewed safety testing to validate their claims.
In a current article in Computer Earth publication, Marc L. Songini wrote:
That is about if the confirmation and validation operations these models go through are woefully inferior or not. The e-voting businesses aren't volunteering their methods for separate audits and analysis."
Could be the protection in e-voting around the criteria that organization professionals could demand inside their purposes? "Number way." "Certainly not." "Five years back, yes, but in the present weather, no." "These people are betting their important organization processes on software." "They need to contemplate who may do harm compared to that system." "That level of rigor is not applied to e-voting systems."
A document trail in Texas is an issue that's to be resolved by the secretary of state. Legislation once was drafted but never went anywhere. Since Texas doesn't require the report walk, the units can not be purchased. Their state of Texas in addition has failed to involve the latest edition of eSlate pc software that will enable printing and better security.
Gerry Birnberg, Harris State Democratic Celebration Chairman, mentioned "I also do not understand the purpose about areas perhaps not to be able to purchase Hart printers. While they are perhaps not expected to do so at the present time, there is no legitimate prohibition against their doing so if they want to and if Hart InterCivic's is ready to offer them to them. A state may use techniques which provide voter verifiable paper trails if it really wants to, actually although the Texas Legislature has not even required so it do so."
Tradition Technique Seat Steve Behrman of Harris District stated "Hart's VVPAT (voter verifiable paper trail)'alternative'only works using its v6 pc software, which is neither accessible or licensed for used in Texas. Regardless, number selected official from possibly celebration has pushed some of Hart's commercial misrepresentations or monopolistic practices. Hart may be the favorite of Democratic selected officials who've, merely, number understanding whatsoever of the specialized or economic dimensions of procuring, using, sustaining, depreciating, or changing manufactured goods."